Educational technologies in environmental law: implications for sustainable development and modern education

Authors

Keywords:

Educational technologies, environmental law, sustainable development, online platforms

Abstract

This research explores how Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are changing the teaching of environmental law by integrating tools such as online platforms and interactive simulations. These technologies not only improve the accessibility and flexibility of learning, but also provide immersive practical experiences that help students apply legal concepts in real scenarios. The methodology used, was a systematic review of scientific literature published between 2014 and 2024, using recognized databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Redalyc and Latindex. Peer-reviewed studies were selected, excluding opinion articles or those that did not directly address educational technologies in the teaching of environmental law. The results showed that, although ICTs have improved the quality and accessibility of education in this field, important challenges persist such as the technological gap in regions with less infrastructure and resistance to change on the part of some educators. In addition, it was found that most of the studies reviewed do not evaluate the long-term impact of these technologies on learning and professional development. It underscores the need for inclusive educational policies that promote the equitable use of ICTs, and highlights the importance of continued research that addresses both the ethical challenges and the long-term impact on the development of sustainable competencies.

References

Ahmad, S., Rahmat, M., Mubarik, M., Alam, M., & Hyder, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Education. Sustainability, 13(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902

Alvarado, J., Calipuy, M., Sota, K., & Soto, M. (2023). Technological Gap and Academic Performance in Times of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review. (Ponencia). 21th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI 2023). Buenos Aire, Argentina.

Antúnez Sánchez, A., & López, E. (2018). La formación jurídico ambiental mediada por el uso de las Tic. Revista Iberoamericana De bioeconomía Y Cambio climático, 4(8), 974–1004. https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v4i8.6713

Ardoin, N., Bowers, A., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Arutyunyan, M., & Russkikh, V. (2023). Norms and principles of international environmental law as a national environmental education element. E3S Web of Conferences, 458. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345804013

Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones. (2024). Sitio Oficial. https://www.apc.org/

Asongu, S., Orim, S., & Nting, R. (2019). Inequality, information technology and inclusive education in sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 380-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2019.06.006

Carrión-Martínez, J., De la Rosa, A., Fernández-Cerero, J., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2020). Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliographic Review. Sustainability, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083288

Cho, Y., & Park, K. (2023). Designing Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation for Environmental Science Education. Electronics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020315

Claramunt, J. C. (2020). Innovación docente y TIC desde la perspectiva de la docencia en Derecho. Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica Del Derecho, 7(2), 167–167. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2020.57150

Dike, N. (2018). Integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into Environmental Education: A Key to Promoting Sustainable Development. Journal of environment and earth science, 8(9), 81-85. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEES/article/viewFile/44225/45625

Emina, K. (2021). Sustainable development and the future generations, 2, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.25273/SHE.V2I1.8611.

González-Zamar, M., Abad-Segura, E., López-Meneses, E., & Gómez-Galán, J. (2020). Managing ICT for Sustainable Education: Research Analysis in the Context of Higher Education. Sustainability, 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198254

Huang, T., Lin, W., & Yueh, H. (2019). How to Cultivate an Environmentally Responsible Maker? A CPS Approach to a Comprehensive Maker Education Model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-019-09959-2

Jackson, E. (2015). Impact of MOODLE platform on the pedagogy of students and staff: Cross-curricular comparison. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9438-9.

Juca Maldonado, F., Lalangui Ramírez, J., & Bastidas Andrade, M. I. (2020). Rutas inmersivas de Realidad Virtual como alternativa tecnológica en el proceso educativo. Revista Metropolitana De Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.62452/ghznt417

Khan, S., Hwang, G., Abbas, M., & Rehman, A. (2018). Mitigating the urban-rural educational gap in developing countries through mobile technology-supported learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 50, 735-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12692

Kiger, M., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42, 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Lin, P., Hou, H., & Chang, K. (2020). The development of a collaborative problem solving environment that integrates a scaffolding mind tool and simulation-based learning: an analysis of learners’ performance and their cognitive process in discussion. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 1273-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1719163.

Lirola, M. M. (2018). La Enseñanza de la Justicia Ambiental en el Marco de la Educación para el Desarrollo Sostenible en la Universidad. Revista Internacional de Educación Para La Justicia Social, 7(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2018.7.1.003

Mavengere, N., Edifor, E., Adedoyin, F., Apeh, E., & Owusu, A. (2022). Education inequality in underserved regions: Exploring the role of technology to promote diversity and inclusivity. (Ponencia). IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE). Bournemouth, United Kingdom.

Mofam, R., Nafiu, A., Asuquo, P., & Igwe, A. (2023). The Impact of International Technology Transfer on Technology Gap in the Context of Developing Countries. Innovare Journal of Education, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i4.48093

Murga-Menoyo, M. Á. (2018). La Formación de la Ciudadanía en el Marco de la Agenda 2030 y la Justicia Ambiental. Revista Internacional De Educación Para La Justicia Social, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2018.7.1.002

Ozuem, W., Willis, M., & Howell, K. (2022). Thematic analysis without paradox: sensemaking and context. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-07-2021-0092

Pande, P., Thit, A., Sørensen, A., Mojsoska, B., Moeller, M., & Jepsen, P. (2021). Long-term effectiveness of immersive VR simulations in undergraduate science learning: lessons from a media-comparison study. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/RLT.V29.2482

Petersen, G., Klingenberg, S., Mayer, R., & Makransky, G. (2020). The virtual field trip: Investigating how to optimize immersive virtual learning in climate change education. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 51, 2098-2114. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m7vp9

Puentes-Duarte, C. (2023). La educación ambiental en Colombia en el marco de los objetivos del desarrollo sostenible. CIENCIAMATRIA, 9(2), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v9i2.1187

Rupnik, D., & Avsec, S. (2020). Effects of a transdisciplinary educational approach on students’ technological literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19, 121-141. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.121

Salca Rotaru, C. (2023). The Challenges of Teaching Environmental Law – Short Analysis. Bulletin of the Transilvania, 15(64). https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2022.15.64.2.20

Siddaway, A., Wood, A., & Hedges, L. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.

Sousa, M. (2021). Modding modern board games for e-learning: a collaborative planning exercise about deindustrialization. (Ponencia). 4th International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE). Lisboa, Portugal.

Sun, A., & Scanlon, B. (2019). How can Big Data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: a survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environmental Research Letters, 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1b7d.

UNIR. Ecuador. (2024). La Universidad en Internet. https://ecuador.unir.net/derecho/maestria-derecho-ambiental/

Universidad Espíritu Santo. (2024). Maestría en Derecho Ambiental Con Mención En Sostenibilidad. https://online.uees.edu.ec/postgrado/maestria-en-derecho-ambiental

Universidad Europea en Ecuador - Universidad a Distancia. (2024). Universidad Europea ecuador. https://ecuador.universidadeuropea.com/

Universidad San Francisco de Quito. (2024). Maestría en Derecho Ambiental, Sostenibilidad y Recursos Natuarales. https://www.usfq.edu.ec/es/subespecializaciones/derecho-ambiental-sostenibilidad-y-recursos-naturales

Webster, E., & Mai, L. (2020). Transnational environmental law in the Anthropocene. Transnational Legal Theory, 11, 1 - 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1778888

Zhuk, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Impact on the Environment: Hidden Ecological Costs and Ethical-Legal Issues. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(4), 932–954. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.40

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Juca-Maldonado, F. X., & Medina-Peña, R. (2024). Educational technologies in environmental law: implications for sustainable development and modern education. Revista Científica Episteme & Praxis, 2(3), 5–13. Retrieved from https://epistemeypraxis.org/index.php/revista/article/view/57