Formative Assessment. Main challenges teachers face when implementing formative assessment in elementary school classrooms.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62451/rep.v3i3.128Keywords:
Formative assessment, Basic education, Teaching practice, Resistance to changeAbstract
This article analyzes the main challenges faced by teachers after implementing formative assessment in basic education classrooms, in the context of the New Mexican School (NEM). Although this curricular proposal seeks to focus assessment on meaningful and continuous learning, teachers face resistance to change, social pressures, strict educational policies and institutional limitations to put formative assessment into practice. The research highlights that the traditional use of assessment as a control mechanism continues to persist, hindering the transformation towards student-centered assessment. It opts for strengthening continuous teacher training, fostering collaboration with families, promoting spaces for critical reflection and recovering pedagogical autonomy so that formative evaluation becomes a liberating, inclusive and authentic process. Therefore, the need for a cultural and professional transformation of the concept and practice of formative assessment in Mexico is highlighted.
References
Anijovich, R., & Cappelletti, G. (2020). La retroalimentación formativa: Una oportunidad para mejorar los aprendizajes y la enseñanza. Revista Docencia Universitaria, 21(1), 81–96. https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistadocencia/article/view/11327
Anijovich, R., & González, C. (2011). Evaluar para aprender: conceptos e instrumentos. Aique Grupo Editor.
Córdoba, F. (2000). La evaluación de los estudiantes: una discusión abierta. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.35362/rie3972537
Córica, J. L. (2020). Resistencia docente al cambio: Caracterización y estrategias para un problema no resuelto. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.2.26578
Cruzado Saldaña, J. J. (2022). La evaluación formativa en la educación. Comuni@cción: Revista De Investigación En Comunicación Y Desarrollo, 13(2), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.13.2.672
Díaz Barriga, F., & Hernández Rojas, G. (2000): Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. McGraw-Hill.
Franco Marín, K. V., & Orrego Noreña, J. F. (2023). Familia y escuela: límites y posibilidades en la construcción de vínculos educativos. Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 19(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.17151/rlee.2023.19.1.4
Hortigüela, D., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & González-Calvo, G. (2019). Pero… ¿A qué nos Referimos Realmente con la Evaluación Formativa y Compartida?: Confusiones Habituales y Reflexiones Prácticas. Revista Iberoamericana De Evaluación Educativa, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2019.12.1.001
Martínez Rizo, F. (2013). Dificultades para implementar la evaluación formativa: Revisión de literatura. Perfiles educativos, 35(139), 128-150. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-26982013000100009&lng=es&tlng=es.
Montoya Flores, J. F., Toledano Pérez, M., García López, E. D., Téllez Rivera, E., & Hermosillo Durán, C. (2023). Evaluación formativa en el aula (1ª ed.). Instituto Hidalguense de Educación.
Moreno Olivos, T. (2016). Evaluación del aprendizaje y para el aprendizaje (1.ª ed.). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Moreno-Olivos, T. (2010). Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo: las muchas caras de la evaluación. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 1(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2010.2.6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brisa Rodríguez-Guerrero, José Félix Montoya-Flores, Lesly Rodríguez-Pérez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Episteme & Praxis agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.





