Distributive justice as the content of contemporary economic constitutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62451/rep.v3i2.103Keywords:
Economic constitution, distributive justice, sustainable developmentAbstract
In recent years, the economic analysis of law has gained relevance in the legal field, manifesting itself in two forms: the primacy of economics and its complicity in legal problems. This analysis must respect the Constitution as the supreme norm that regulates the organization of the State. The Constitution is fundamental for all branches of law, including economic law, and establishes precepts that guide and limit the economic action of the State. These principles are essential for the institutional structure and its long-term implementation. Hence the importance, relevance and topicality of the subject. In Latin America, national constitutions address economic aspects in a variety of ways. Some, such as those of Argentina and Chile, disperse the economic treatment throughout the constitutional text, while others, such as Bolivia and Ecuador, dedicate specific sections to these issues. Commonly, topics such as planning, private property and consumer protection. Distributive justice is concerned with how goods and opportunities are distributed in a society. Given growing inequality, it is crucial to analyze how economic constitutions can promote a more equitable distribution of resources and access to basic services. In line with this, a review of the literature on the topic is presented. The document review methodology was used as an exploratory and analytical technique for the analysis of relevant information.
References
Arcos Ramírez, F. (2012). La justicia distributiva global: del igualitarismo de la suerte al constructivismo. DOXA, Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 35, 361-392. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/47439/1/Doxa_35_15.pdf
Argentina. Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. (2016). Constitución de la Nación Argentina. Ley Nº 24.430. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/constitucion_de_la_nacion_argentina.pdf
Atria, J., Castillo, J., & Ramírez, S. (2020). Economic élites attitudes toward meritocracy in Chile: A moral economy perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(9). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764220941214
Birdart Campos, G. J. (2002). La Constitución económica. (Un esbozo desde el Derecho Constitucional Argentino). Cuestiones Constitucionales, 6, 3-16 https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/885/88500601.pdf
Bolivia. Congreso Nacional. (2009). Constitución Política del Estado Bolivia. http://www.gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/app/webroot/archivos/CONSTITUCION.pdf
Chile. Senado de la República. (2024). Constitución Política de la República de Chile. Ley Nº 21.654. https://www.senado.cl/acerca-del-senado/normativa/constitucion-politica
Dworkin, R. (2008). La democracia posible. Principios para un nuevo debate político. Paidós.
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449 https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/02/Constitucion-de-la-Republica-del-Ecuador_act_ene-2021.pdf
García-Pelayo, M. (1991). Consideraciones sobre las cláusulas económicas de la Constitución. Obras completas. Centro de Estudios Constitucionale.
Mac-Clure, O., Barozet, E. & Franetovic, G. (2024) Justicia distributiva y posición social subjetiva: ¿la meritocracia justifica la desigualdad de ingresos? Convergencia, 1, 1-39.
https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v31i0.22258
Migliore, J. (2011). Amartya Sen: la idea de la justicia. Revista Cultura Económica, 29, (81/82), 13-26. http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/amartya-sen-idea-justicia.pdf
Morales, L. (2014). La constitucionalización de los derechos sociales en la encrucijada entre las exigencias de la democracia y las demandas de la justicia distributiva. Revista Libertas, 1(2), 30-61. https://www.academia.edu/68811168/La_Constitucionalizaci%C3%B3n_De_Los_Derechos_Sociales_en_La_Encrucijada_Entre_Las_Exigencias_De_La_Democracia_y_Las_Demandas_De_La_Justicia_Distributiva
Pérez-Garzón, C. A. (2019). ¿Qué es justicia social? Una nueva historia de su significado en el discurso jurídico transnacional. Revista Derecho del Estado, 43, 67-106. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3376/337660349004/html/
Ralws, J. (2006). Teoría de la justicia. Sexta reimpresión. FCE. https://archive.org/details/RawlsJohnTeoriaDeLaJusticia/page/n1/mode/2up
Sen, A. (2011). La idea de la justicia. Taurus.
Silva Rojas, A., Flantrmsky Cárdenas, O., & Díaz Forero, Y. E. (2017). Derecho tributario y teorías de la justicia: una visión desde la propuesta aristotélica y las teorías contemporáneas de la justicia de Rawls y Dworkin. Reflexión Política, 19(37), 72-85. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=11052397013
Viera Álvarez, C., Bassa Mercado, J., & Ferrada Bórquez, J. C. (2016). Una aproximación a la idea de constitución económica y sus alcances en la constitución chilena. Boletín Mexicano Derecho Comparado, 49(145), 1-37. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0041-86332016000100011#fn29
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda González-Gelabert, Dayamí Danyelis Gelabert-Veliz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Episteme & Praxis agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.








